🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."